Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Sharan 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 809 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 885 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2430 litres | 2297 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Seat Alhambra has more luggage space (by 509 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 133 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`540 kg | 2`370 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`851 kg | 1`803 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 689 kg | 567 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Volkswagen Sharan. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
| |