Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 70 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Alhambra consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 809 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2430 litres | 2339 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 91 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`540 kg | 2`620 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`851 kg | 1`704 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 689 kg | 916 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 33 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |