Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 40 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Alhambra has 33 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. This could mean that the Seat Alhambra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 2`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |