Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Nissan Primastar 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 25 HP more power than Nissan Primastar, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Nissan Primastar. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.5 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Primastar, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.94 m | |
| Seat Alhambra is 7 cm longer than the Nissan Primastar, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 2150 litres | |
|
Nissan Primastar has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Alhambra has 1883 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Primastar. This could mean that the Seat Alhambra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Primastar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 2`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Nissan Primastar has
| |