Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Ford S-Max 2010

 
Seat Alhambra
2010 - 2015
Ford S-Max
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP140 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds10.9 seconds
Seat Alhambra and Ford S-Max have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.76.0
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1220 km in combined cycle1160 km in combined cycle
1400 km on highway1340 km on highway
950 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.77 m
Width: 1.90 m1.88 m
Height: 1.72 m1.66 m
Seat Alhambra is larger.
Seat Alhambra is 8 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 6 cm higher.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: 267 litres285 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data285 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 267 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2000 litres
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford S-Max.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3702`505
Safety:
Ford S-Max is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
low

low
Ford S-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably better
Average price (€): 12 2007200
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • lower fuel consumption
Ford S-Max has
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv