Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010

 
Seat Alhambra
2010 - 2015
Volkswagen Sharan
2010 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds10.7 seconds
Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.67.2
Real fuel consumption: 9.2 l/100km9.3 l/100km
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 60 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle970 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1140 km on highway
760 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.85 m
Width: 1.90 m1.90 m
Height: 1.72 m1.74 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 267 litres809 litres
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space.
Seat Alhambra has 542 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3102`290
Safety:
Quality:
low

low
Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12 20015 000
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv