Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Touran. Despite the higher power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 46 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 11 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 267 litres | 121 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1339 litres | 1989 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Seat Alhambra has more luggage space (by 146 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 650 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`500 kg | 2`150 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`790 kg | 1`536 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 710 kg | 614 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Volkswagen Touran. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |