Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger, but lower. Seat Alhambra is 4 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Alhambra has 123 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. This could mean that the Seat Alhambra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |