Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Mazda 5 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 35 HP more power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Mazda 5. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 27 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 15 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 809 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2430 litres | 1597 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 833 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`290 kg | 2`085 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`723 kg | 1`395 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 567 kg | 690 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Mazda 5. Therefore, Mazda 5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mazda 5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Mazda 5, so Mazda 5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |