Seat Alhambra 2015 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010

 
Seat Alhambra
2015 - 2018
Volkswagen Sharan
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 184 HP170 HP
Torque: 380 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds9.8 seconds
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Alhambra engine produces 14 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.35.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.0 l/100km7.6 l/100km
By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1320 km in combined cycle1180 km in combined cycle
1450 km on highway1290 km on highway
870 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.85 m
Width: 1.90 m1.90 m
Height: 1.72 m1.74 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 267 litres885 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 267 litres300 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data885 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2297 litres2430 litres
In 7-seat version Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space (by 33 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Sharan (by 133 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.9 meters
Gross weight: 2`550 kg2`370 kg
Net weight:1`770 kg1`728 kg
Load capacity:780 kg642 kg
Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Volkswagen Sharan. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:Seat Alhambra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 235 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 15 00010 800
Pros and Cons: Seat Alhambra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv