Seat Alhambra 2015 vs Ford Galaxy 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 26 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 267 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2297 litres | 2339 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 42 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`550 kg | 2`620 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`770 kg | 1`704 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 780 kg | 916 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |