Seat Alhambra 2015 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 885 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 267 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 885 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2297 litres | 2430 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space (by 33 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Sharan (by 133 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`540 kg | 2`370 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`768 kg | 1`728 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 772 kg | 642 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Volkswagen Sharan. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 235 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |