Seat Alhambra 2015 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger, but lower. Seat Alhambra is 4 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 267 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2297 litres | 2325 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Ford Galaxy has more luggage space (by 123 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 28 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`540 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`768 kg | 1`656 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 772 kg | 849 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |