Seat Alhambra 2015 vs Ford Galaxy 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 60 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Alhambra has 33 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. This could mean that the Seat Alhambra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 2`620 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |