Seat Alhambra 2015 vs Ford S-Max 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Ford S-Max. Despite less power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
1480 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
940 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
Seat Alhambra is 6 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 6 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 285 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 285 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 267 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2020 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 2`615 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford S-Max scores higher in safety tests. The Ford S-Max scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | low | low | |
Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford S-Max, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 13 600 | 10 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |