Seat Alhambra 2015 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 13 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1550 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger, but lower. Seat Alhambra is 4 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Alhambra has 123 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. This could mean that the Seat Alhambra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |