Seat Alhambra 2015 vs Ford Galaxy 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 220 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, but torque is 5 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Despite less power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 267 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2297 litres | 2339 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 42 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`490 kg | 2`585 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`763 kg | 1`658 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 727 kg | 927 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |