Seat Alhambra 2015 vs Ford Galaxy 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, but torque is 10 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Despite less power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
760 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra is 1 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 300 litres | |
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Alhambra has 33 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. This could mean that the Seat Alhambra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`510 | |
Safety: | |||
Ford Galaxy scores higher in safety tests. The Ford Galaxy scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | low | low | |
Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 16 000 | 14 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |