Seat Alhambra 2015 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is more dynamic to drive. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, but Seat Alhambra torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Alhambra consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Alhambra consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 267 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 885 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2297 litres | 2297 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space (by 33 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`420 kg | 2`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`680 kg | 1`723 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 740 kg | 567 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Volkswagen Sharan. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |