Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Alhambra is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Sharan can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 90 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 235 NM | 170 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.3 seconds | 11.8 - 19.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 11.5 | 6.5 - 13.6 | |
|
Seat Alhambra petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Seat Alhambra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`886 | ~ 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |