Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Opel Mokka 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Alhambra is available only with front wheel drive, while Opel Mokka can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Opel Mokka is available also with LPG engines. LPG engines generally provide lower running costs and cleaner emissions compared to petrol and diesel engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 110 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 235 NM | 155 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.3 seconds | 9.4 - 12.5 seconds | |
| In general, Opel Mokka are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Seat Alhambra. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 11.5 | 4.7 - 7.9 | |
|
Seat Alhambra petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Mokka. On average, Seat Alhambra equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 34 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, 4 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1597 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Seat Alhambra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Alhambra (by 225 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.9 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`400 kg | ~ 1`929 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`703 kg | ~ 1`471 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 697 kg | ~ 458 kg | |
| Seat Alhambra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 34 procentiem more than Opel Mokka. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |