Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Mercedes Vito 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.3 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 98 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 235 NM | 210 - 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.3 seconds | 12.7 - 20.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 11.5 | 8.8 - 13.8 | |
|
Seat Alhambra petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes Vito. On average, Seat Alhambra equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is smaller. Seat Alhambra is 4 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes Vito, which means Seat Alhambra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`886 | ~ 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
| |