Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Toyota Previa 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 116 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 235 NM | 225 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.3 seconds | 10.9 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 11.5 | 7.2 - 10.8 | |
|
Seat Alhambra petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Previa. On average, Seat Alhambra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Seat Alhambra is 13 cm shorter than the Toyota Previa, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`886 | ~ 2`227 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |