Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Seat Alhambra 1996 is available only with front wheel drive, while Seat Alhambra 2000 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 115 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 235 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.3 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 11.5 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
Seat Alhambra 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Alhambra 2000. On average, Seat Alhambra 1996 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra 2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra 1996 is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra 2000, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra 1996 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra 1996 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra 2000. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`886 | ~ 1`956 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |