Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 90 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 235 NM | 135 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.3 seconds | 12.2 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 11.5 | 5.5 - 8.7 | |
|
Seat Alhambra petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Seat Alhambra equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 34 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`886 | ~ 1`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |