Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 110 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 235 NM | 170 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.3 seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 11.5 | 5.7 - 8.9 | |
|
Seat Alhambra petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 Picasso. On average, Seat Alhambra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Seat Alhambra is 15 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`886 | ~ 1`426 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |