Seat Alhambra 1996 vs BMW 3 series 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Seat Alhambra is available with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 115 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 235 NM | 175 - 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.3 seconds | 7.1 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 11.5 | 5.5 - 9.5 | |
|
Seat Alhambra petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Seat Alhambra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 36 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 32 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 1.7 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`886 | ~ 1`874 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |