Seat Alhambra 2000 vs Ford S-Max 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Seat Alhambra is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford S-Max can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.8 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 204 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 7.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 6.2 - 9.7 | |
Seat Alhambra petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, a Seat Alhambra with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford S-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
Seat Alhambra is smaller, but higher. Seat Alhambra is 14 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 854 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
Ford S-Max has more luggage space. Seat Alhambra has 598 litres less trunk space than the Ford S-Max. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`956 | ~ 2`433 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |