Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 200 HP | 115 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.4 | 5.7 - 8.2 | |
|
Seat Alhambra petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Seat Alhambra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger, but lower. Seat Alhambra is 4 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Alhambra has 123 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. This could mean that the Seat Alhambra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`343 | ~ 2`486 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |