Seat Alhambra 2010 vs Mazda 5 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 200 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 165 - 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | 11.2 - 13.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.4 | 5.2 - 8.3 | |
Seat Alhambra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 5. On average, Seat Alhambra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.62 m | |
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 27 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 15 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 112 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1597 litres | |
Seat Alhambra has more luggage capacity. Seat Alhambra has 155 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 5. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Seat Alhambra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`343 | ~ 2`115 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |