Seat Alhambra 2015 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 220 HP | 140 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 380 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.3 seconds | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 7.3 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Seat Alhambra petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. On average, Seat Alhambra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Volkswagen Sharan are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 809 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space. Seat Alhambra has 542 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`492 | ~ 2`337 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |