Saab 9-7X 2005 vs Ford Explorer 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Saab 9-7X is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Explorer can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 4.2 - 5.3 | 4.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 290 - 300 HP | 295 HP | |
Torque: | 373 - 447 NM | 406 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 8.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 - 14.1 | 14.3 | |
Saab 9-7X petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Explorer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.91 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.85 m | |
Saab 9-7X is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 5 cm wider, while the height of Saab 9-7X is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1127 litres | 385 litres | |
Saab 9-7X has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Saab 9-7X has 742 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. The Ford Explorer may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`745 | ~ 2`825 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Saab 9-7X has
|
| |