SAAB 900 1994 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 900 engine produces 8 HP more power than Volvo V40, but torque is 43 NM less than Volvo V40. Despite the higher power, SAAB 900 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 5.4 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 900 consumes 5.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 900 could require 885 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| SAAB 900 is 27 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 900 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |