SAAB 900 1995 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2002
| Body: | Coupe | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
SAAB 900 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 900 engine produces 73 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Thanks to more power SAAB 900 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 8.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 900 consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 900 could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.52 m | |
| SAAB 900 is 59 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 1 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 900 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means SAAB 900 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 900 has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |