SAAB 900 1994 vs Mazda MX-3 1994

 
SAAB 900
1994 - 1998
Mazda MX-3
1994 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 130 HP110 HP
Torque: 177 NM137 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds10.5 seconds
SAAB 900 engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda MX-3, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mazda MX-3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.96.9
The Mazda MX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 900 consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 900 could require 600 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway830 km on highway
Mazda MX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a SAAB 900 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including SAAB 9-3, SAAB 9000Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda Xedos 6, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato, Kia Carens
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda MX-3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.22 m
Width: 1.71 m1.70 m
Height: 1.44 m1.31 m
SAAB 900 is larger.
SAAB 900 is 42 cm longer than the Mazda MX-3, 1 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 900 is 13 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data135 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-3, which means SAAB 900 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`430
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: SAAB 900 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Mazda MX-3 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv