SAAB 900 1994 vs Ford Mustang 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 900 engine produces 17 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, SAAB 900 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 9.3 | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 900 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 900 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 900) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.34 m | |
| SAAB 900 is 3 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 11 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 900 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means SAAB 900 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 900 has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |