SAAB 900 1988 vs Ford Sierra 1987

 
SAAB 900
1988 - 1993
Ford Sierra
1987 - 1989
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 128 HP105 HP
Torque: 173 NM157 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds10.4 seconds
SAAB 900 engine produces 23 HP more power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Ford Sierra. Despite the higher power, SAAB 900 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.68.1
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 900 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 900 could require 225 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
Ford Sierra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 900) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Sierra) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.42 m
Width: 1.69 m1.69 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
SAAB 900 is 27 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, width is practically the same , while the height of SAAB 900 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`350
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 44001800
Pros and Cons: SAAB 900 has
  • more power
Ford Sierra has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv