SAAB 900 1988 vs Fiat Croma 1986
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 169 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
SAAB 900 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 900 engine produces 38 HP more power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Fiat Croma. Thanks to more power SAAB 900 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 7.1 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 900 consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 900 could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| SAAB 900 is 19 cm longer than the Fiat Croma, 7 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 900 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 900 has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |