SAAB 900 1984 vs SAAB 90 1984
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
| SAAB 900 engine produces 18 HP more power than SAAB 90, whereas torque is 5 NM more than SAAB 90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.0 | |
|
The SAAB 90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 900 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 900 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| SAAB 90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| SAAB 900 is 16 cm longer than the SAAB 90, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 0.2 metres less than that of the SAAB 90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 900 has
|
SAAB 90 has
| |