SAAB 900 1984 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| SAAB 900 engine produces 22 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 9.0 | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 900 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 900 could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.68 m | |
| SAAB 900 is 42 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 14 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 900 is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 644 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 900 has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |