SAAB 900 1984 vs SAAB 90 1984
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 162 NM | 162 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
SAAB 900 and SAAB 90 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.0 | |
The SAAB 90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 900 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 900 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
SAAB 90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
SAAB 900 is 16 cm longer than the SAAB 90, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 0.2 metres less than that of the SAAB 90. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3800 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
SAAB 90 has
| |