SAAB 900 1984 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| SAAB 900 engine produces 40 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 9.0 | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 900 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 900 could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.68 m | |
| SAAB 900 is 42 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 14 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 900 is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 644 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 900 has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |