SAAB 900 1984 vs Fiat Croma 1986
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 169 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 900 engine produces 10 HP more power than Fiat Croma, but torque is 7 NM less than Fiat Croma. Despite the higher power, SAAB 900 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 7.1 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 900 consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 900 could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| SAAB 900 is 24 cm longer than the Fiat Croma, 7 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 900 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 900 has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |