SAAB 900 1995 vs Mazda 626 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
SAAB 900 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 900 engine produces 68 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power SAAB 900 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 900 consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 900 could require 450 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
|
SAAB 900 is smaller, but higher. SAAB 900 is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 4 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 900 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data SAAB 900 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 900 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |