SAAB 900 1994 vs Nissan 200 SX 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| SAAB 900 is available with front wheel drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 185 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 - 263 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 12.5 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 11.3 | 8.8 - 9.3 | |
|
SAAB 900 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.30 m | |
| SAAB 900 is 12 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 2 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 900 is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 307 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means SAAB 900 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |