SAAB 900 1994 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 185 HP | 82 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 - 263 NM | 120 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 12.5 seconds | 10.5 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 11.3 | 5.5 - 8.8 | |
|
SAAB 900 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.52 m | |
| SAAB 900 is 59 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 1 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 900 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means SAAB 900 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`663 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 900 has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |