SAAB 900 1984 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| SAAB 900 is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Scorpio can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.1 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Ford Scorpio is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 175 HP | 92 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 - 273 NM | 171 - 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 14 seconds | 8.8 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 11.0 | 7.1 - 11.2 | |
|
SAAB 900 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| SAAB 900 is 4 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 7 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 900 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 900 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`753 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 900 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |