SAAB 90 1984 vs Audi 100 1984
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 90 engine produces 15 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, SAAB 90 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 8.9 | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 90 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 90 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
SAAB 90 is smaller. SAAB 90 is 21 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 610 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 90 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means SAAB 90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 90 has
|
Audi 100 has
| |