SAAB 90 1984 vs VAZ 2105 1980
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 92 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 18 seconds | |
|
SAAB 90 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 90 engine produces 36 HP more power than VAZ 2105, whereas torque is 70 NM more than VAZ 2105. Thanks to more power SAAB 90 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 39 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 390 km in combined cycle | |
| SAAB 90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (VAZ 2105) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.13 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
SAAB 90 is larger, but slightly lower. SAAB 90 is 45 cm longer than the VAZ 2105, 7 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 90 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 345 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`395 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 90 has
|
| |