SAAB 90 1984 vs Jaguar XJ 1982
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAAB 90 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Jaguar XJ has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 3.4 - 5.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 162 - 290 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 255 - 436 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 8.7 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 12.5 - 14.1 | |
|
SAAB 90 petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
SAAB 90 is smaller, but slightly higher. SAAB 90 is 38 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 8 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 90 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 90 is 2.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means SAAB 90 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 90 has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |